Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, understand, use and manage emotions in yourself and others. Here is where the idea came from, what the research does and doesn't support, and how emotional skills can be developed.
On this page
- Origins of the Idea
- Models of Emotional Intelligence
- Goleman's Four Domains Model
- Measuring Emotional Intelligence
- What the Research Shows
- Myths and Criticisms
- Core Emotional Skills
- Developing Self-Awareness
- Emotional Regulation Strategies
- Developing Empathy
- Social Skills and Relationship Management
- EQ in Leadership and the Workplace
- EQ in Relationships and Parenting
- Cultural Considerations
- EQ and Mental Health
- Developing EQ in Children
- Practical Exercises
- Conclusion
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources
Emotional intelligence (EI, often called EQ) is the ability to perceive, understand, use and manage emotions, both your own and other people's. The term entered psychology in 1990, when Peter Salovey and John Mayer described it as a set of abilities for processing emotional information. Journalist and psychologist Daniel Goleman's 1995 bestseller then turned "EQ" into a household phrase.
Today emotional intelligence is studied in two main ways: as a set of measurable abilities, and as a cluster of traits and self-perceived skills. Research supports the idea that emotional skills matter for wellbeing, relationships and some kinds of work, but it also shows that many popular claims about EQ have been exaggerated. This page explains the main models, how EI is measured, what the evidence says, the main criticisms and practical ways to develop emotional skills.
Origins of the Idea
1920
Edward Thorndike describes "social intelligence," the ability to understand and manage people.
1983
Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences includes interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences.
1990
Peter Salovey and John Mayer publish "Emotional Intelligence," defining it as the ability to monitor and use emotions to guide thinking and action.
1995
Daniel Goleman's book Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ becomes an international bestseller.
1997
Mayer and Salovey refine their four-branch ability model; Reuven Bar-On publishes the EQ-i questionnaire.
2000s
The MSCEIT ability test and K. V. Petrides's trait EI model and TEIQue questionnaire appear; meta-analyses begin testing EI's predictive value.
Models of Emotional Intelligence
There is no single agreed definition. Researchers usually group models into three families.
| Model | Key figures | What EI is | Typical measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ability model | Mayer and Salovey | A form of intelligence: skills for reasoning about and with emotions | MSCEIT (performance test) |
| Trait model | Petrides | Emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions, part of personality | TEIQue (self-report) |
| Mixed models | Goleman; Bar-On | A broad blend of emotional abilities, personality traits and social competencies | EQ-i 2.0, ESCI (self- and multi-rater) |
The four-branch ability model (Mayer and Salovey)
This is the most theoretically rigorous model. It describes four related abilities, from basic to more complex:
- Perceiving emotions: recognising emotions accurately in faces, voices, art and in yourself.
- Using emotions to facilitate thought: harnessing moods to support tasks, for example using a positive mood for creative brainstorming.
- Understanding emotions: knowing how emotions combine, change over time and relate to situations, for instance that irritation can escalate into rage.
- Managing emotions: regulating your own emotions and influencing others' in ways that support goals.
The trait model (Petrides)
K. V. Petrides and Adrian Furnham argued that self-report EI questionnaires don't measure abilities at all but people's beliefs about their emotional capacities. Trait EI is therefore treated as a personality construct, closely related to the Big Five traits, especially low neuroticism and high extraversion and agreeableness.
Mixed models (Bar-On and Goleman)
Reuven Bar-On's model groups emotional and social competencies into areas such as intrapersonal skills, interpersonal skills, adaptability, stress management and general mood. These mixed models are popular in business and coaching because they map neatly onto workplace behaviours, but critics argue they include so many traits that "emotional intelligence" becomes a catch-all label.
Goleman's Four Domains Model
Goleman originally described five components: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills. In later work with Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee, these were organised into four domains, each with several competencies.
Self-awareness
Recognising your emotions as they happen, understanding their effects and having a realistic sense of your strengths and limits.
Self-management
Managing disruptive emotions and impulses, adapting to change, staying motivated and maintaining a constructive outlook.
Social awareness
Empathy, reading the emotional climate of groups and organisations, and noticing others' needs.
Relationship management
Influence, coaching, handling conflict, teamwork and inspiring others.
Goleman's framework is widely used in leadership development. It is useful as a vocabulary for emotional and social skills, but it is broader and less precisely defined than the ability model, and some of its strongest early claims, such as the book subtitle's suggestion that EQ "can matter more than IQ," went beyond the evidence available at the time.
Measuring Emotional Intelligence
How EI is measured shapes what it predicts.
- MSCEIT (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test): a performance test with items such as identifying emotions in faces or choosing the most effective way to handle an emotional situation. Answers are scored against expert or consensus judgments.
- EQ-i 2.0: a self-report questionnaire based on Bar-On's model, widely used in organisations.
- TEIQue (Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire): a self-report measure of trait EI developed by Petrides.
- Multi-rater tools such as the Emotional and Social Competency Inventory (ESCI), in which colleagues rate a person's behaviour.
A recurring finding is that ability and self-report measures correlate only weakly, suggesting they capture different things. Self-report scores are vulnerable to people's tendency to see themselves favourably, and they overlap heavily with personality. Ability tests have their own problems, such as debate over what counts as the "correct" answer to an emotional problem. For more on psychological testing generally, see personality assessments.
What the Research Shows
Work performance
A meta-analysis by Dana Joseph and Daniel Newman (2010) found that EI predicted job performance, but modestly. Ability EI added little once cognitive ability and personality were taken into account, whereas mixed-model measures added more, partly because they overlap with traits like conscientiousness and self-efficacy. EI appeared more relevant in jobs requiring "emotional labour," such as customer service and caregiving. See emotional intelligence at work.
Wellbeing and mental health
Higher EI, especially trait EI, is consistently associated with greater life satisfaction, lower stress and fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. Much of this research is correlational, so it is hard to tell whether EI protects mental health, whether good mental health raises self-rated EI, or both. Difficulties identifying and describing feelings, known as alexithymia, sit at the opposite end of some EI skills and are linked with several mental health problems.
Relationships
Studies link higher EI with more satisfying friendships and romantic relationships and with more constructive conflict styles. Skills such as accurately reading a partner's emotions and responding with empathy are also central to research-based couples approaches such as the Gottman method.
Can EI be trained?
A meta-analysis by Mattingly and Kraiger (2019) found that EI training programs produced moderate improvements on average. However, many studies were small, short-term and relied on self-report, and effects on ability measures were smaller. School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, which teach emotional awareness and regulation, have shown benefits for social behaviour and academic outcomes in large reviews.
Myths and Criticisms
Emotional intelligence has attracted strong criticism alongside its popularity.
- "EQ matters more than IQ." General cognitive ability remains one of the best single predictors of job and academic performance. EI's added contribution is real but smaller.
- Widely shared statistics. Claims such as "EQ accounts for 58% of performance in all jobs" or "90% of top performers have high EQ" come from consultancy materials rather than peer-reviewed research and should not be treated as established findings.
- Conceptual stretch. Edwin Locke (2005) argued that EI is too broadly defined to be a coherent intelligence. Mixed models in particular include motivation, optimism and social skills that are already studied under other names.
- Overlap with personality. Trait and mixed EI scores correlate strongly with the Big Five, raising questions about how much new information they add.
- Misuse. Emotional skills can be used manipulatively; research on the "dark side" of EI suggests that emotion-management skills combined with self-serving motives can help people influence others for their own ends.
None of this means emotional skills are unimportant. It means the scientific picture is more modest and more nuanced than popular books and training courses sometimes suggest.
Core Emotional Skills
Whatever model you use, a handful of concrete skills recur:
- Emotional awareness and granularity: noticing emotions and naming them precisely ("disappointed" rather than just "bad"). Research by Lisa Feldman Barrett and others links finer-grained emotion labels with better regulation.
- Emotion understanding: knowing what typically causes emotions and how they unfold, such as that anger often follows perceived unfairness or that anxiety concerns future threat.
- Emotion regulation: influencing which emotions you have and how you express them. James Gross's process model describes strategies such as situation selection, attention shifting and cognitive reappraisal. Reappraisal is generally linked with better outcomes than habitual suppression. See emotion regulation.
- Empathy: understanding others' perspectives (cognitive empathy) and resonating with their feelings (affective empathy). See empathy.
- Relationship skills: active listening, assertive expression, handling conflict and repairing ruptures. See communication skills.
Developing Self-Awareness
- Regular emotional check-ins: a few times a day, ask "What am I feeling right now, and where do I notice it in my body?"
- Expand your emotion vocabulary: use a feelings list or emotion wheel to move beyond "fine," "stressed" and "angry."
- Journaling: brief written reflection on emotional events helps identify triggers and patterns. See journaling for mental health.
- Mindfulness practice: training attention to present-moment experience, including emotions, without immediately reacting. See mindfulness meditation.
- Feedback: ask trusted people how you come across when stressed, or use structured multi-rater feedback at work.
Emotional Regulation Strategies
In the moment
- Pause: a short structured pause, such as stop, take a breath, observe, then proceed, creates space between feeling and action.
- Slow breathing with longer exhales can lower physical arousal. See breathing exercises.
- Name it to tame it: putting feelings into words ("I'm feeling embarrassed") has been linked in lab studies to reduced emotional reactivity.
Thinking strategies
- Cognitive reappraisal: deliberately considering another interpretation of a situation. See cognitive restructuring.
- Self-distancing: reflecting on a problem from an observer's perspective, or even in the third person, can reduce emotional intensity.
Longer-term habits
Sleep, physical activity, social connection and stress management all affect how easily emotions can be regulated. When emotions feel persistently overwhelming, therapies such as DBT, which teaches emotion regulation skills directly, may help.
Developing Empathy
Psychologists distinguish cognitive empathy (understanding what someone thinks and feels), affective empathy (feeling with them) and empathic concern or compassion (being moved to help). Practical ways to strengthen empathy include:
- Active listening: giving full attention, reflecting back what you heard and asking open questions before offering opinions.
- Perspective-taking: deliberately imagining the situation from the other person's point of view, including circumstances you can't see.
- Curiosity about difference: spending time with people whose lives differ from yours. Some studies suggest reading literary fiction is linked with better theory of mind, though experimental findings have been mixed.
- Managing empathic distress: intense sharing of others' pain can lead to burnout. Compassion-focused approaches aim to stay caring without becoming overwhelmed.
Social Skills and Relationship Management
- Assertive communication: expressing needs and limits clearly without aggression or passivity. See how to set boundaries.
- Constructive conflict: focusing on specific behaviours, avoiding contempt and taking breaks when flooded.
- Repair: acknowledging hurt, apologising specifically and reconnecting after disagreements.
- Responsiveness: noticing and responding to others' bids for attention and support.
EQ in Leadership and the Workplace
Emotional intelligence is popular in leadership development. Research on leadership suggests that leaders who are perceived as emotionally attuned tend to be rated more favourably by their teams, and that emotional climate influences engagement and psychological safety. However, studies linking leader EI to objective performance are mixed, and much of the evidence uses self-report or ratings by the same people. Using EI assessments to make hiring decisions is controversial because self-report scores are easy to inflate.
EQ in Relationships and Parenting
In close relationships, emotional skills show up as noticing a partner's mood, responding to attempts at connection and managing conflict without escalation. In parenting, John Gottman's research on "emotion coaching," in which parents notice children's emotions, label them and help children problem-solve, has been linked with better emotional and social outcomes in children. See parenting strategies.
Cultural Considerations
Cultures differ in "display rules," the norms about which emotions can be shown, to whom and how intensely. Behaviour that looks emotionally intelligent in one culture, such as openly expressing disagreement, may seem inappropriate in another. EI measures developed mainly in Western, English-speaking samples may not translate perfectly, and researchers increasingly emphasise culturally informed definitions.
EQ and Mental Health
Many evidence-based therapies target emotional skills directly. Dialectical behavior therapy teaches emotion regulation and distress tolerance; emotionally focused therapy helps couples understand and express underlying emotions; acceptance and commitment therapy encourages making room for difficult feelings. Low emotional awareness or regulation is associated with several mental health conditions, but EI scores are not a diagnostic tool. Anyone struggling with persistent emotional difficulties should speak to a qualified professional.
Developing EQ in Children
Emotional skills develop throughout childhood: infants learn through caregivers' attuned responses, toddlers begin naming feelings, preschoolers start to understand others' emotions and school-age children learn more complex emotions and regulation strategies. Schools increasingly use social and emotional learning curricula. A large meta-analysis by Durlak and colleagues (2011) found that SEL programs improved social-emotional skills, behaviour and academic performance on average.
Practical Exercises
- Three-times-a-day check-in: pause morning, midday and evening to name your emotion and its intensity from 1 to 10.
- Emotion diary: once a day, note one emotional event, what triggered it, what you thought and what you did.
- Reappraisal practice: for one frustrating event a day, write two alternative explanations.
- Listening practice: in one conversation a day, summarise what the other person said before giving your view.
- Feedback: ask someone you trust, "How do I come across when I'm stressed?"
Conclusion
Emotional intelligence describes real and useful capacities: recognising feelings, understanding them, using them to guide thinking and managing them in yourself and others. The science behind it is more modest than its popular reputation. Emotional intelligence does not replace cognitive ability or explain most of life success, and how it is measured matters a great deal. Still, emotional skills are linked with wellbeing and better relationships, and evidence suggests they can be strengthened with practice.
Frequently asked questions
What is emotional intelligence?
Emotional intelligence is the capacity to recognise emotions in yourself and others, use emotions to support thinking, understand how emotions arise and change, and manage emotions effectively. Salovey and Mayer, who introduced the concept in 1990, defined it as a set of abilities. Other models treat it more broadly as a mix of personality traits and social skills.
What are the components of emotional intelligence?
In Mayer and Salovey's ability model there are four branches: perceiving emotions, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotions and managing emotions. Daniel Goleman's popular model originally listed five components: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills, later grouped into four domains: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management.
Is EQ more important than IQ?
Not according to the research. General cognitive ability remains one of the strongest single predictors of academic and job performance. Emotional intelligence adds some predictive value, especially in jobs with heavy emotional demands, but meta-analyses find its effects are modest and partly overlap with personality traits and IQ. Both kinds of ability matter in different ways.
Can emotional intelligence be improved?
Evidence suggests emotional skills can be trained to some degree. Meta-analyses of EI training programs, often delivered in workplaces or schools, report small to moderate improvements, though many studies are short-term and rely on self-report. Practical skills such as naming emotions, reappraisal and active listening are teachable and are used in therapies and social-emotional learning programs.
How is emotional intelligence measured?
There are two main approaches. Ability tests such as the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) ask people to solve emotional problems, like identifying emotions in faces, and score answers against expert or consensus norms. Self-report questionnaires such as the EQ-i 2.0 and TEIQue ask people to rate their own tendencies. The two approaches correlate only weakly with each other.
What is the difference between emotional intelligence and empathy?
Empathy, the ability to understand and share another person's feelings, is one part of emotional intelligence. EI is broader: it also includes recognising and managing your own emotions and using emotional information to guide decisions and relationships. Someone can be highly empathic yet struggle to regulate their own emotions, and vice versa.
Sources
- Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.
- Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence. Basic Books.
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
- Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15(6), 425–448.
- Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54–78.
- Locke, E. A. (2005). Why emotional intelligence is an invalid concept. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 425–431.
- Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 140–155.