Therapy Approaches

Solution-Focused Brief Therapy

SFBT is a short, goal-directed talking therapy that spends less time analyzing problems and more time building on what already works.

On this page
  1. What Is Solution-Focused Brief Therapy?
  2. Core Techniques
  3. The SFBT Session Structure
  4. Clinical Applications
  5. The Therapeutic Stance
  6. Research Evidence
  7. Strengths of SFBT
  8. Limitations and Criticisms
  9. Integration with Other Approaches
  10. Practical Examples
  11. Self-Application
  12. Conclusion
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. Sources

Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) is a short-term, strengths-based talking therapy that helps people describe the future they want and build on what is already working, rather than analyzing the causes of their problems. It was developed by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg. Rather than dwelling on problems, pathology, or past causes, SFBT focuses on identifying solutions, amplifying what's working, and co-constructing preferred futures. Through specific questioning techniques and a collaborative stance, SFBT helps clients achieve meaningful change efficiently, often in just a few sessions.

What Is Solution-Focused Brief Therapy?

SFBT emerged in the late 1970s and 1980s at the Brief Family Therapy Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, founded in 1978 by Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg and colleagues. The team was influenced by the brief strategic therapy of the Mental Research Institute in Palo Alto, by the hypnotherapist Milton Erickson's focus on clients' own resources, and by the family systems tradition. By studying recordings of sessions, they noticed that clients often improved when conversations focused on what they wanted and on times things went better, rather than on detailed analysis of problems.

The approach was described in a 1986 paper in Family Process and in de Shazer's books Keys to Solution in Brief Therapy (1985) and Clues (1988). Berg went on to apply it widely in child welfare, substance use and school settings. Today SFBT is used by counselors, social workers, psychologists and coaches around the world.

Foundational Assumptions

1. If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It

Not everything in a client's life needs changing. SFBT identifies what's working and builds on it rather than assuming wholesale dysfunction.

2. Once You Know What Works, Do More of It

Clients already possess resources and have experienced exceptions to problems. Therapy amplifies these existing successes.

3. If It Doesn't Work, Don't Do It Again - Do Something Different

Continued problem analysis keeps people stuck. SFBT breaks the cycle by redirecting attention toward solutions and new behaviors.

4. Small Steps Can Lead to Big Changes

Change doesn't require dramatic insight or transformation. Small, achievable differences can snowball into significant improvement.

5. The Solution Is Not Necessarily Related to the Problem

In SFBT, understanding the causes of a problem is not considered necessary for finding a solution. This contrasts with psychodynamic assumptions and reflects the broader observation that insight does not automatically produce change.

6. The Language for Solution Development Is Different from Problem Description

Problem talk generates more problem talk. Solution talk generates possibilities. SFBT deliberately shifts linguistic patterns.

Core Techniques

The Miracle Question

Perhaps SFBT's most famous intervention:

"Suppose tonight while you're sleeping, a miracle happens and the problems that brought you here are solved. But you don't know this miracle has happened because you were asleep. When you wake up tomorrow morning, what will be the first small sign that tells you this miracle has occurred?"

Purpose:

  • Bypasses problem analysis to envision preferred future
  • Generates concrete, observable goals
  • Activates hope and possibility
  • Reveals what clients value and want

Follow-up questions:

  • "What else will be different?"
  • "How will others notice the change?"
  • "What will you be doing differently?"
  • "On a scale of 0-10, where are you now relative to this miracle day?"

Example:
Client: "I'd wake up feeling peaceful. I wouldn't immediately worry about work."
Therapist: "What would you do instead of worrying?"
Client: "Maybe take a few minutes to enjoy my coffee, look out the window."
Therapist: "When was the last time you did that, even briefly?"

Exception Questions

Problems aren't constant - there are always times when the problem is absent or less severe. These "exceptions" reveal existing solutions.

Questions:

  • "When is the problem less noticeable?"
  • "Tell me about a recent time when you expected the problem but it didn't happen"
  • "What's different about the times when things go better?"
  • "How did you get that to happen?"

Purpose: Identify client resources, coping strategies, and conditions supporting success so they can be replicated.

Example:
Client: "I'm always anxious."
Therapist: "Always? Has there been any moment recently, even briefly, when you felt calmer?"
Client: "Well, yesterday morning before everyone woke up..."
Therapist: "Tell me more about that. What were you doing? What made that possible?"

Scaling Questions

Numerical scales create concrete measurement and conversation about change.

Basic format: "On a scale of 0-10, where 0 is [worst] and 10 is [best], where are you today?"

Applications:

  • Progress measurement: "Where are you now vs. when we started?"
  • Goal setting: "Where would you like to be?"
  • Resource identification: "How did you get from 2 to 4? What did you do?"
  • Next steps: "What would a 5 look like? What small thing would move you from 4 to 5?"
  • Confidence: "How confident are you that you can do this (0-10)?"
  • Motivation: "How important is this goal to you (0-10)?"

Key insight: If someone rates themselves at 3, they're NOT at 0, 1, or 2. Exploring what accounts for being at 3 reveals resources and strategies already working.

Coping Questions

When clients feel overwhelmed or stuck, coping questions acknowledge difficulty while highlighting resilience:

  • "How have you managed to cope with this?"
  • "What keeps you going despite these challenges?"
  • "How have you prevented things from getting worse?"
  • "Where do you find the strength to keep trying?"

These questions reframe problems as challenges the client is actively managing, revealing hidden strengths.

Relationship Questions

Exploring how others perceive situations can provide new perspectives:

  • "What would your partner say you're doing differently?"
  • "How would your best friend describe the change they've noticed?"
  • "If I asked your child what's better, what would they say?"

This technique externalizes perception, sometimes making change more visible.

Compliments and Affirmations

SFBT therapists actively notice and acknowledge client strengths, resources, and efforts:

  • "That took real courage to try something new"
  • "You're clearly committed to your family"
  • "I'm impressed by your persistence despite setbacks"

Not empty praise but genuine recognition of client competence and values.

The Formula First Session Task (FFST)

Sometimes given as between-session assignment:

"Between now and next time we meet, I'd like you to observe what's happening in your life that you'd like to continue happening."

This shifts attention from problems to what's working, priming solution-focused awareness.

The SFBT Session Structure

First Session

1. Problem Description (Brief)

Acknowledge the problem without extensive exploration: "What brings you here? What needs to change?"

2. Goal Formulation

Use miracle question or direct inquiry: "How will you know therapy has been helpful? What will be different?"

Goals should be:

  • Stated in positive terms (what will be present, not absent)
  • Specific and behavioral
  • Achievable and realistic
  • Important to the client
  • Interpersonally relevant

3. Exception Exploration

Identify times when the problem was less severe or absent and what was different.

4. Scaling

Assess current position and desired change.

5. Intervention Message

Brief consultation break, then feedback including:

  • Compliments (genuine acknowledgment of strengths)
  • Bridging statement (connecting compliments to task)
  • Task or suggestion (often doing more of what works)

Subsequent Sessions

Opening: "What's better?" (not "How have you been?" which invites problem talk)

Amplification: When client reports improvements, explore in detail - how did they do it, who noticed, what else is better

Scaling progress: Track movement on previously established scales

Next steps: Identify next small change to pursue

Conclusion: Compliments and encouragement to continue what's working

Clinical Applications

Depression

Rather than analyzing causes of depression, SFBT explores:

  • Exceptions: When is depression less severe?
  • Miracle day: What would life without depression look like?
  • Coping: How have you managed to get through difficult days?
  • Small steps: What's one small thing that might help?

Some trials suggest SFBT can reduce depressive symptoms. In the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study, for example, solution-focused therapy and short-term psychodynamic therapy produced similar improvements over the first year, while long-term psychodynamic therapy caught up and overtook both by three years. Evidence is not strong enough to call SFBT a first-line treatment for depression.

Anxiety

SFBT identifies moments of calm, strategies that work, and preferred states rather than analyzing anxiety sources.

Substance Use

Focuses on client goals, periods of control or sobriety, and building motivation rather than confronting denial. This overlaps with motivational interviewing, which has a larger evidence base for substance use.

Relationship Issues

Miracle question helps couples envision desired relationship, exception questions identify when they relate well, scaling tracks relationship satisfaction and improvement.

Children and Adolescents

Age-appropriate scaling (using hands to show size of problem, drawing scales), externalization (naming the problem, a technique borrowed from narrative therapy), and focus on strengths rather than deficits work well with young people.

School Settings

Brief, goal-focused nature makes SFBT ideal for school counselors. Focus on when student behaves appropriately, what helps them succeed, and small achievable changes.

The Therapeutic Stance

Not-Knowing Position

Similar to narrative therapy, SFBT therapist takes curious, non-expert stance. Client is expert on their life; therapist is expert in asking helpful questions.

Collaborative Relationship

Client and therapist work as team toward client-defined goals. No hidden agenda or therapist-determined treatment plan.

Respectful Curiosity

Genuine interest in how clients have managed, what resources they possess, and what they want for their future.

Hopeful Expectancy

Assumption that change is possible and likely. This isn't false optimism but grounded in recognizing existing client strengths and exceptions.

Research Evidence

SFBT has a growing, generally positive, but uneven evidence base:

  • Systematic reviews: Wallace Gingerich and Lance Peterson's 2013 review of 43 controlled studies found that about three-quarters reported significant benefits for SFBT, across problems such as depression, behavior problems, parenting and occupational rehabilitation.
  • Meta-analyses: Johnny Kim's 2008 meta-analysis found small positive effects overall, strongest for internalizing problems such as low mood and anxiety.
  • Comparisons: Where SFBT has been compared with established therapies, results are often similar in the short term, as in the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study.
  • Brevity: Courses are often shorter than other therapies, commonly fewer than eight sessions.

Limitations include small samples, varied definitions of what counts as SFBT, and few trials with rigorous designs. SFBT is therefore best described as a promising, widely used approach rather than an established treatment for specific disorders.

Strengths of SFBT

Efficiency

Brief by design, which can be valuable in settings with limited resources and for people who want focused, practical help.

Empowering

Positions client as competent expert rather than deficient patient. Builds on strengths rather than dwelling on deficits.

Hopeful

Solution focus activates hope and possibility, contrasting with approaches that might inadvertently increase hopelessness through problem immersion.

Accessible

Concrete, action-oriented approach appeals to people who find insight-oriented therapy frustrating or confusing.

Applicable Across Problems

Works for diverse issues without requiring problem-specific protocols.

Cross-Cultural

Respect for client expertise and non-pathologizing stance work well across cultures. Goal-focus allows cultural variations in what constitutes desired change.

Limitations and Criticisms

May Not Suit All Clients

Some people need to process trauma, explore emotions, or understand patterns before moving to solutions. Premature solution-focus can feel invalidating.

Depth vs. Symptom Relief

Critics argue SFBT addresses surface symptoms without deeper change. Proponents counter that meaningful life changes constitute real change regardless of mechanism.

Trauma Considerations

For complex trauma, pure solution focus may bypass necessary emotional processing. Integration with trauma-informed approaches may be needed.

Appears Simplistic

Can seem like "just think positive" to critics, though practitioners argue the approach is sophisticated in its strategic use of language and focus.

Requires Specific Training

While principles seem simple, skillful SFBT requires training in questioning techniques and avoiding common pitfalls.

Integration with Other Approaches

SFBT can complement other modalities:

  • With CBT: Solution focus enhances goal-setting and homework between CBT sessions
  • With motivational interviewing: Both emphasize autonomy and client-directed change
  • With narrative therapy: Shared emphasis on client expertise and preferred futures
  • With mindfulness: Present-moment focus and accepting what works

Practical Examples

Couple Conflict

Problem-focused approach might ask: "What causes your fights? What triggers the conflict?"

SFBT asks:

  • "When do you not fight despite opportunity? What's different those times?"
  • "If a miracle happened and you woke up getting along beautifully, what would each of you notice first?"
  • "On a scale of 0-10, where is your relationship today? What accounts for not being lower? What would one point higher look like?"

Child Behavior Problem

Traditional approach: Explore family dysfunction, child's past trauma, underlying causes

SFBT approach:

  • "Tell me about times when [child] behaves well. What's happening then?"
  • "What are you doing differently as parents when things go better?"
  • "If we solve this problem, what will [child] be doing instead of the problem behavior?"

Work Stress

Problem focus: "Why is work so stressful? What about your boss bothers you?"

Solution focus:

  • "What helps you cope when work is stressful?"
  • "When has work been more manageable, even slightly? What was different?"
  • "How would you know things were improving? What would be the first small sign?"

Self-Application

Some SFBT ideas can be used as everyday reflection tools, alongside goal setting. They are not a substitute for professional help with persistent or severe difficulties.

Ask Yourself Solution-Focused Questions

  • "What's working in my life right now, even partly?"
  • "When is this problem less noticeable? What's different then?"
  • "If this issue resolved overnight, what would I notice tomorrow?"
  • "What's one small step toward my preferred situation?"

Notice and Amplify What Works

When something goes well, don't dismiss it as luck - ask what you did to make it happen, how you can do more of it.

Scale Your Progress

Rate where you are on any goal (0-10), celebrate not being lower, identify what would constitute one point higher.

Language Shift

Notice when you engage in problem talk and consciously redirect: Instead of "Why am I always anxious?" try "When am I calmer, and what helps?"

Conclusion

Solution-focused brief therapy offers a hopeful, practical alternative to problem-centered approaches. By treating clients as resourceful, focusing on preferred futures, and amplifying what already works, it aims to help people make meaningful changes in a small number of sessions.

This isn't naive optimism or denial of real problems. It's strategic redirection of attention toward possibilities and strengths. Problems are acknowledged but not allowed to dominate the narrative. The question shifts from "What's wrong and why?" to "What do you want and how can you get there?"

In a field that can become overwhelmed by pathology, diagnosis, and deficits, SFBT's insistence on viewing clients as competent, resourceful humans deserves appreciation. Sometimes the most helpful thing isn't understanding why we're stuck but discovering how we can move forward - and recognizing we're already doing so, even in small ways.

One of SFBT's founding assumptions is that the solution is not necessarily related to the problem. Whether that holds for a given person depends on their situation; for some, a more problem-focused or trauma-focused therapy will be a better fit. Our overview of types of therapy can help you compare options.

Frequently asked questions

What is the miracle question in SFBT?

The miracle question asks a client to imagine that a miracle happens overnight and the problem that brought them to therapy is solved, but they don't know it happened because they were asleep. The therapist then asks what the first small signs would be the next morning. The answers help define concrete, observable goals and often reveal steps the person could start taking right away.

How many sessions does solution-focused therapy take?

SFBT is designed to be brief. Many courses last somewhere between three and eight sessions, and sessions may be spaced further apart as progress is made. The number is not fixed in advance; the therapist and client decide together when the client's goals have been met well enough. Some people return for occasional follow-up sessions later.

Is solution-focused brief therapy evidence-based?

SFBT has a growing evidence base. Systematic reviews, including one of 43 controlled studies by Wallace Gingerich and Lance Peterson in 2013, found that most studies reported positive outcomes, with effects roughly similar to other therapies in some comparisons. However, many studies were small or had methodological weaknesses, and SFBT is not usually named as a first-line treatment for specific disorders in clinical guidelines.

What is the difference between SFBT and CBT?

CBT identifies and changes unhelpful thoughts and behaviors that maintain a problem, often using structured techniques and homework designed around a specific disorder. SFBT spends little time analyzing problems; it focuses on the client's preferred future and on exceptions, times when the problem is less present. CBT has a much larger evidence base for specific mental health conditions, while SFBT is often used flexibly across settings.

Who is solution-focused therapy not suitable for?

SFBT may be less suitable for people who need to process trauma, who are in crisis, or who have severe or complex conditions that call for specialized treatment. Some people also feel unheard if a therapist moves to solutions too quickly. A good SFBT practitioner will acknowledge difficulties fully and refer on or combine approaches when needed.

Sources

  1. de Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to Solution in Brief Therapy. W. W. Norton.
  2. de Shazer, S. (1988). Clues: Investigating Solutions in Brief Therapy. W. W. Norton.
  3. de Shazer, S., Berg, I. K., Lipchik, E., Nunnally, E., Molnar, A., Gingerich, W., & Weiner-Davis, M. (1986). Brief therapy: Focused solution development. Family Process, 25(2), 207–221.
  4. Gingerich, W. J., & Peterson, L. T. (2013). Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy: A systematic qualitative review of controlled outcome studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(3), 266–283.
  5. Kim, J. S. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(2), 107–116.
  6. Knekt, P., et al. (2008). Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long- and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 38(5), 689–703.

About this page. Written and reviewed by the iPsychology Editorial Team using peer-reviewed research, textbooks and guidance from bodies such as the APA, NIMH, NHS and WHO. Content is educational and is not a substitute for professional advice. Spotted an error? Let us know.